http://inz.fi/blog/2009/02/26/vdso32-disabler-kernel-module/ inz's blog about life, universe and everything Wed, 25 Apr 2012 17:17:18 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 http://inz.fi/blog/2009/02/26/vdso32-disabler-kernel-module/comment-page-1/#comment-154367 inz's blog » Scratchbox on AMD64 Thu, 17 Jun 2010 09:12:15 +0000 http://inz.fi/blog/?p=125#comment-154367 [...] yesterday’s vdso32 hack. The same colleague now built amd64 packages for maemo4 [...] [...] yesterday’s vdso32 hack. The same colleague now built amd64 packages for maemo4 [...]

]]> http://inz.fi/blog/2009/02/26/vdso32-disabler-kernel-module/comment-page-1/#comment-127179 inz Thu, 26 Feb 2009 12:47:10 +0000 http://inz.fi/blog/?p=125#comment-127179 Yes, that can be done, but I consider that to be boot-time, not run-time. Yes, that can be done, but I consider that to be boot-time, not run-time.

]]> http://inz.fi/blog/2009/02/26/vdso32-disabler-kernel-module/comment-page-1/#comment-127176 tme Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:53:44 +0000 http://inz.fi/blog/?p=125#comment-127176 works for me - good job. works for me - good job.

]]> http://inz.fi/blog/2009/02/26/vdso32-disabler-kernel-module/comment-page-1/#comment-127172 Adrien Bustany Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:25:53 +0000 http://inz.fi/blog/?p=125#comment-127172 Well, you could always pass vdso32=0 as a kernel option right ? Anyway, the module approach, even if hackish, is more convenient. Well, you could always pass vdso32=0 as a kernel option right ? Anyway, the module approach, even if hackish, is more convenient.

]]>